Keadilan Sosial Dalam Kitab Amos: Analisis Eksegetis-Kontekstual dan Relevansinya Bagi Masyarakat Indonesia Kontemporer
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56194/spr.v5i2.120Keywords:
Amos, keadilan sosial, eksegesis, Pancasila, Indonesia kontemporerAbstract
Abstrak
Kitab Amos merupakan salah satu teks profetik Perjanjian Lama yang menekankan keadilan sosial sebagai inti dari kesetiaan umat kepada Allah. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pesan keadilan sosial dalam kitab Amos melalui pendekatan eksegetis-kontekstual, sekaligus menyingkap relevansinya bagi Indonesia kontemporer yang masih bergumul dengan kesenjangan sosial, korupsi, diskriminasi hukum, dan ketidakadilan struktural. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kualitatif dengan pendekatan eksegesis biblika serta analisis kontekstual terhadap kondisi sosial Indonesia. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa Amos menolak pemisahan antara ibadah liturgis dan tanggung jawab sosial; iman sejati harus diwujudkan dalam praksis keadilan. Pesan Amos menemukan relevansi kuat dengan cita-cita Pancasila, khususnya sila kelima tentang “Keadilan Sosial bagi Seluruh Rakyat Indonesia.” Kebaruan penelitian ini terletak pada upaya menjembatani studi eksegesis dengan refleksi sosial-politik Indonesia masa kini, sehingga memperlihatkan peran teks biblika sebagai sumber kritik profetik sekaligus inspirasi transformatif bagi masyarakat modern.
References
Anderson, F. I. Habakkuk: A New Translation with Introduction and Commentary. Yale University Press, 2001.
Barton, John, ed. “The Theology of the Book of Amos.” In The Theology of the Book of Amos, 133–60. Old Testament Theology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139046497.007.
Bevans, Stephen. “Models of Contextual Theology.” Theological Studies 55, no. 3 (1994): 584.
Boaheng, Isaac. A Study of Amos And Hosea: Implications for African Public Theology. Noyam, 2024. https://doi.org/10.38159/npub.eb2024401.
———. “A Thematic and Literary Analysis of Amos 5:4-7, 10-15: Implications for Ghanaian Leaders.” Edited by Alfred Appiah. E-Journal of Religious and Theological Studies, September 29, 2022, 241–52. https://doi.org/10.38159/erats.2022884.
———. “Socio-Economic Justice in the Book of Amos: Implications for the Contemporary Church in Ghana.” E-Journal of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences 3, no. 9 (2022): 1483–95. https://doi.org/10.38159/ehass.2022391.
Creswell, John W, and J David Creswell. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Sage publications, 2017.
Fee, G D, and D Stuart. How to Read the Bible for All Its Worth: Fourth Edition. Zondervan Academic, 2014. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=sGBtAgAAQBAJ.
Göran Eidevall. Tafsir Klasik Seperti Amos: A New Translation with Introduction and Commentary. Yale University Press, 2018.
Habib, Ahmad Munir, and M J Gilalo. “The Relevance of the Five Principles of Pancasila in the Indonesian Legal System.” Indonesian Journal of Business and Law Enforcement 6, no. 1 (2025): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.56442/ijble.v6i1.995.
Halawa, Iman Kristina, Daniel Pesah Purwonugroho, and Didit Yuliantono Adi. “Esther’s Stand Against Injustice: Theology for Women’s Political Participation in Indonesia.” Evangelikal: Jurnal Teologi Injili Dan Pembinaan Warga Jemaat 9, no. 2 (2025): 209–227. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.46445/ejti.v9i2.954.
Hamborg, Graham R, ed. “Book of Amos.” In Hosea, Joel, and Amos, 260–376. New Cambridge Bible Commentary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2023. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1017/9781108687362.005.
Jeremias, J. The Book of Amos: A Commentary. The Old Testament Library Series. Marburg: Presbyterian Publishing Corporation, 1998.
Kennard, D W. A Critical Realist’s Theological Method: Returning the Bible and Biblical Theology to Be the Framer for Theology and Science. Center for Origins Research Issues in Creation. Wipf and Stock Publishers, 2013. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=DlH7DwAAQBAJ.
Lê, V?n Lu?n. “Khái Ni?m Công Bình Xã H?i Theo Sách Amos.” Khoa H?c Công Giáo và ??i S?ng 3, no. 2 (July 21, 2023): 71–77. https://doi.org/10.54855/csl.23328.
Majazeta Yusrina, Kamila, Mutiara Maharani, Najmii Ula Aliffah, and Neiny Ratmaningsih. “Budaya Korupsi: Ketimpangan Sosial Ekonomi Antar Pejabat Negara Dan Masyarakat Akibat Pandemi.” Jurnal Sosial Dan Sains 3, no. 12 (January 1, 2024): 1328–37. https://doi.org/10.59188/jurnalsosains.v3i12.1158.
Mays, J L. Amos: A Commentary. Old Testament Library. Presbyterian Publishing Corporation, 1969. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=8ZK7BwAAQBAJ.
Paul, Shalom M. Amos: A Commentary on the Book of Amos (Hermeneia) Hardcover, 1990.
Roberts, J J M. Nahum, Habakkuk, and Zephaniah: A Commentary. The Old Testament Library. Geneva: Presbyterian Publishing Corporation, 1991. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=XLe7BwAAQBAJ.
Sipahutar, Roy Charly H. P. “Ibadah Dan Keadilan Sosial: Interpretasi Sosio-Historis Amos 8:4-8 Bagi Hidup Bergereja.” Kurios 7, no. 1 (May 2, 2021): 13. https://doi.org/10.30995/kur.v7i1.193.
Sriwijayati, Helda, Timothy Uriel Pelmar, and Sandro Hasoloan L Tobing. “Penolakan Kurban Dalam Amos 5:21-27 Dan Relevansinya Dengan Sila Kelima Pancasila.” EPIGRAPHE: Jurnal Teologi Dan Pelayanan Kristiani 6, no. 2 (November 30, 2022): 222–37. https://doi.org/10.33991/epigraphe.v6i2.399.
Suhartono, Tony, and Lene Koptin. “Implementasi Keadilan Sosial Perspektif Amos Bagi Gen-Z.” JURNAL IMPARTA 3, no. 1 (July 31, 2024): 01–13. https://doi.org/10.61768/ji.v3i1.119.
Umeanolue, Ikenna L. “Critique against Social Injustice in the Book of Amos: Its Relevance to Development in Nigeria.” UJAH: Unizik Journal of Arts and Humanities 19, no. 2 (November 7, 2018): 182–92. https://doi.org/10.4314/ujah.v19i2.10.
Wiafe, Frimpong, and Benjamin Anson. “The Amos Concept of Justice and Rightteousness (Amos 5:7, 15-24) and Its Implication for the Church in Ghana.” African Journal Online: E-Journal of Religious and Theological Studies, 2016.
Wolff, H W. Amos, the Prophet: The Man and His Background. Fortress Press, 1973. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=i1J0zQEACAAJ.
Wolff, Hans Walter. Amos the Prophet: The Man and His Background. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 1977.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 SAINT PAUL'S REVIEW
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
