ANTITYPE OF JESUS CHRIST BEYOND THE TYPE OF MELCHIZEDEK ON HEBREWS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56194/spr.v1i1.2Keywords:
christology, levite, priesthood, typologyAbstract
In Hebrews, the High Priest theory has a very fundamental and important position in the structure of the entire Hebrews. It can be said that it plays a central role in its quantity and content in the whole text. The words of Ellingworth are quite reasonable, “Perhaps the Hebrews author's idea of ??Christ is very likely to be two central pillars, the ‘Son of God’ (1: 2) and ‘High Priest’ (2:17).”[1] In particular, the idea that Christ in the high priesthood of Jesus Christ is a high priest following the order of Melchizedek is at the heart of the High Priesthood. Because the text of the book of Hebrews emphasizes Jesus Christ as a very different high priest who follows the order of Melchizedek directly and very repeatedly.[2] The texts of the high priesthood of Jesus Christ show the concept that Jesus is the only unique, special, and superior follower of the order of Melchizedek. Therefore, Melchizedek is an essential element in understanding the duty of the High Priest of Jesus Christ.
References
Attridge, H. W. The Epistle to the Hebrews. Hermeneia. Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1989.
Berkeley, A. Mickelsen. Interpreting the Bible, trans. Seoul:Christian Digest, 1996.
Bernard, R. Protestant Biblical Interpretation, trans. Seoul:lifebook, 2008.
Bruce, F. F. The Epistle to the Hebrews: New International Commentary on the New Testament, Trans. Seoul:lifebook, 1986.
Cho, Byoung Su. “Priest which is Higher than Priests.” Christian Reformed Press no.199, 1997.
Ellingworth. New International Greek Testament commentary. Grand Rapids:Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 1993.
Guthrie, D. Hebrews, TNTC 15. Leicester: IVP, 1983.
Horton, F. L. The Melchizedek Tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1976.
Kobelski, P. J. Melchizedek and Melchiresa, CBQMS 10.Washington: Catholic Biblical Association of America , 1981.
Koester, C. R. Hebrews, AB 36. New York:Doubleday, 2001.
Lane, W. L. Hebrews 1-8, World Biblical Commentary 47a. Dallas:Word Books, 1991.
Leschert, Dale. Hermeneutical Foundations of Hebrews: A study in the Validity of Epistle’s Interpretation of some Core Citations from the Psalms. NewYork: The Edwin Mellen Press, 1994.
Moffatt, J. A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Epistle to the Hebrews, ICC. Edinburgh: T. &T. Clark, 1924.
New NIV.
Otto, M. Der brief an die Hebraer: International Biblical Commentary 43, Trans. Seoul: Korea Theological Study Institute, 1987.
Parson, M. C. “Son and High Priest: A Study in the Christology of Hebrews.” EQ 60 (1988): 195-216.
Peterson, D. Hebrews and Perfection. London: Cambridge University Press, 1982.
Rooke, D. W. “Jesus as Royal Priest: Reflections on the Interpretationof the Melchizedek Tradition in Heb 7.” Biblica 81(2000): 81-94.
Wesley, G. Buchanan. Typology and the Gospel. Lanham: University Press of America, 1987.
Yang, Yong Ui. “Jesus the High Priest following the order of Melchizedek.” Journal of Church and Culture, no. 8 (2002): 9-46.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 ST. PAUL'S REVIEW

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.